Field CEO on the stunning flexibility of commercial corporations within the age of disruption

---

Transcript

Alan Murray: Management Subsequent is powered by the oldsters at Deloitte, who, like me, are tremendous centered on how CEOs can lead within the context of disruption and evolving societal expectations. Welcome to Management Subsequent, the podcast in regards to the altering guidelines of enterprise management.

I’m Alan Murray and I’m right here with the perfect co-host a podcaster might ever ask for Ellen. Ellen, how are you at the moment?

Ellen McGirt: Oh, Alan, I’m nice. You simply make my coronary heart sore. I so respect these introductions and you might be completely the perfect co-host and the perfect boss and the perfect author and the perfect all this stuff.

Murray: You don’t should say that however that’s okay. Look, I’m tremendous excited in regards to the interview we’re going to have at the moment and the reason being as a result of the particular person we’re interviewing is sort of like us. I imply he’s not like us within the sense that he co-founded and runs a $4 billion firm. You and I haven’t executed that but. However he’s like us in that he’s a severe management nerd. And he’s Aaron Levie, the CEO of Field. Aaron, thanks a lot for being with us.

Aaron Levie: Hey, good to be right here. Thanks for having me. And I undoubtedly am a nerd on many subjects. So I suppose I’m in good firm.

Murray: Welcome to the nerd present. And I wish to begin with that. I imply, we wish to speak about Field, what Field is, the way it handled the pandemic, all of that. However for those who’re okay with it, I’d like to start out since you a couple of years in the past taught a course at Stanford College on management and the altering guidelines of management, which is precisely what we concentrate on on this podcast. And I’m wondering what your large takeaways from that have have been? Yeah.

Levie: Yeah, um, effectively, I don’t know what I bought myself into. However principally, a pair pals and I, a few years in the past, seven, eight years in the past have been going forwards and backwards on this concept of The Innovator’s Dilemma, which is kind of this foundational idea in in disruption idea, and the way innovator’s dilemma was going to use to extra typical industrial corporations as digital platforms rippled via their business. And so bought along with an current Stanford professor after which one other particular person, who’s a pacesetter at SAP who sort of studied below Clayton Christensen for numerous years. And we principally sort of simply tried to design this course the place we introduced in Fortune 500 corporations in addition to kind of digital disruptors and tried to determine what was going to occur to the the economic corporations as digital platforms redefine their business. So the basic instance is, for those who’re Ford and also you’re promoting automobiles, and swiftly Uber and Lyft present up and automobile rental is and on-demand transportation is the longer term, how do you reply to that dynamic?

Murray: Yeah, yeah. And if I can simply interrupt you for a second. I imply, at the moment, the time you have been beginning the course, I knew lots of people significantly in your a part of the world who thought that the disruptors would win every little thing, proper, that the legacy corporations would lose and the disruptors would win, and that’s not the way in which it performed out.

McGirt: No.

Levie: Nicely, in order that’s really placing that as one among our final sort of submit mortems. So the category went on, I believe 5 – 6 years and I used to be a part of a 3, 4. And the unique thesis was that digital would really redefine each business. I believe we bought a superb checkmark on that. However the incumbents really responded extraordinarily effectively. And so we had an preliminary set of theses that the incumbents wouldn’t reply this successfully and the digital platforms would actually maintain these corporations on their toes. I believe that largely performed out aside from the truth that, really for those who sort of quick ahead to at the moment, many of the incumbents are literally nonetheless in a really sturdy place and digital has enabled lots of them to develop even sooner or get even larger, versus simply ending up in a really defensive place. So you already know, a few examples that in the end performed out, you already know, take into consideration corporations like Disney or Disney Plus, has been an unimaginable response to the direct-to-consumer media business and play and one of many preliminary theses that we had was it’d be very laborious for a standard media firm to go digital, as a result of they are going to be competing with their conventional clients, i.e. totally different film theaters, or the distributors that they usually work with. But it surely really turned out that they have been capable of kind of redefine the enterprise mannequin and go direct-to-consumer in order that was actually thrilling.

Murray: Yeah, you already know, it’s kind of in a manner, Clayton Christensen writing The Innovator’s Dilemma might have helped save legacy corporations as a result of all of them learn it. All of them bought it. They mentioned, Holy cow, we’ve bought to do one thing.

Levie: That’s precisely proper. And so I believe those who they noticed the writing on the wall. One of many actually thrilling issues was the Fortune 500 corporations that we invited the CEOs have been really extraordinarily excited in regards to the class as a result of I believe they, you already know, many of those CEOs felt like they’d discovered the teachings of watching Kodak and Blockbuster, and, you already know, Barnes and Noble, and so they have been very, very, you already know, hellbent on ensuring that didn’t occur to them. And so in the end, I believe we now even have actually good classes on what do you do when you’re one among these incumbents and you’ve got a digital disrupter? How do you evolve your corporation mannequin? How do you just be sure you’re basically kind of enabling your group to compete extra successfully? How do you change into extra agile so you possibly can compete with these smaller startups? In some instances, how do you purchase a number of the competitors or accomplice with them? So there’s a complete bunch of classes round how do you need to change the way in which you’re employed and function within the digital period? After which in the end, you already know, this complete class is clearly you already know, earlier than the pandemic, however what occurred was the businesses that have been effectively ready from a digital technique standpoint, these corporations really grew sooner throughout the pandemic. They have been manner higher off serving their clients in that setting. And so there was a whole lot of worth to being ready with, you already know, understanding how the disruption would disruption play out and the way did you need to go digital to compete extra successfully?

McGirt: Nicely, let me ask you a associated query, if that’s okay. Simply leaping in right here, as a result of I believe it’s extraordinary simply trying again over your profession, you began Field once you have been actually, actually younger, and you’ve got been via an incredible journey. And I’m curious the way you developed your personal management fashion and the place you have been capable of apply a few of these classes that you simply grew to become each a professor, observer and pupil of as you have been going ahead, as a result of I imply, you grew up out loud on the planet.

Levie: Yeah, I’m going have to change the professor time period. I believe technically, I used to be a visitor lecturer so I don’t need any of those resume scandals…so I used to be undoubtedly a visitor lecturer. However my journey is, I believe, fairly typical of a kind of product-oriented founder within the tech business. I imply, it kind of has performed out largely as that that mannequin sort of tends to work which is you already know, I began the corporate with a couple of pals in faculty We had this authentic concept again in 2005, that sooner or later, you’d need to have the ability to work from anyplace, anytime, and be capable to get entry to your entire data from anyplace. And it turned out that was a extremely essential concept within the enterprise market, particularly it’s been essential for shoppers, however actually the actual cash has been made within the enterprise. In order that was, you already know, we sort of walked into the precise concept on the proper time because the market was transferring extra to the cloud and transferring towards cellular and the Web was getting sooner and infrastructure was getting cheaper. In order that was the unique concept of the corporate and my concentrate on day one in kind of co-founding the corporate was on the product aspect. And so a whole lot of the teachings I’ve discovered have been via the lens of product and technique and actually the concept corporations reside and die by how successfully they’re they’re serving their clients, how customer-centric their group is, how progressive their firm is. And so I took a whole lot of these classes to coronary heart, you already know, just like the innovator’s dilemma dialog round how corporations lose their manner and so, a lot of my job I see as ensuring that we are able to constitution a path sooner or later with the precise product, with the precise technique, serving our clients as as successfully as potential. After which attempt to encompass myself with a management workforce that may really get the job executed and ship on no matter these targets and technique finally ends up being. And so in the end, my success as a pacesetter, quote, unquote, is actually simply because of the the precise leaders that I get to work with, after which their capability to go construct groups and construct product and serve clients. And I see my job as attempting to do my greatest to coordinate that and ensure that the workforce is aligned and that we’re pointed in in an efficient route and be taught from the market and you already know, what’s taking place round us to make sure that we’re on the precise path. In order that’s sort of the on the highest degree what I see my job as being after which, you already know, hopefully enabling leaders inside the group to have the ability to execute and get unblocked and ship on their targets.

McGirt: So very foundationally, what’s Field and the way has the entire modifications on the planet transferring to hybrid and distant work impacted you?

Levie: Yeah, so once we began the corporate, the unique kind of marketing strategy that we wrote and like marketing strategy itself is a fairly antiquated idea however we really actually wrote a doc that was our marketing strategy. We like bought a template on-line of like, how do you write a marketing strategy? We’ve the SWOT evaluation. We’ve the, you already know, the the market dimension. I believe we most likely sizes the market at like a couple of 100 million {dollars} or one thing. I imply, all of the bulletins very immature, however however within the authentic concept, we known as out that sooner or later, you’d need to have the ability to work from anyplace and be capable to get entry to your information from anyplace. And that is again in 2005. And the massive traits that we have been seeing have been for those who sort of return to that that period, we had Blackberrys, we have been getting on cable modems, Firefox had simply emerged. And so the web was getting a bit bit extra wealthy and interactive, since you might construct higher purposes and our idea was that sooner or later, why would you be lugging round you already know, exterior laborious drives and USB thumb drives, you’d need to have the ability to get entry to your information from anyplace. And for principally 13 14 years, we needed to pitch all people that we might run into on the thought of cloud computing, digital transformation, having the ability to work from anyplace, that this could actually be what the longer term seemed like.

After which the pandemic hits, and swiftly in a single day, what was you already know, perhaps a nice-to-have or a strategic benefit for a buyer or an enterprise immediately grew to become a necessity. And so the businesses that did the perfect throughout the pandemic, particularly at first of the pandemic, have been those who had already constructed the inspiration of, you already know, working within the cloud and dealing in a digital-first manner and having a provide chain that was, you already know, comparatively digitized and having shopper and worker experiences that have been digital first. These corporations did the perfect. They responded effectively to the pandemic. Then, you already know, those who that have been nonetheless working on paper or had legacy processes or have been in you already know, legacy datacenter methods, they responded much less effectively. They transfer much less rapidly. After which in the end, I believe issues have markedly converged the place all people acknowledges they should be within the cloud and to have the ability to go digital and so are our enterprise is, we’re within the enterprise of serving to enterprises be capable to work on this fashionable manner the place you’re way more agile, you’re way more collaborative, you possibly can work from anyplace and information is on the heart of every little thing we do.

Murray: Nicely so so what’s this contemporary manner? It seems like we’re nonetheless attempting to determine it out, proper? We all know what it was like earlier than the pandemic. We all know what we did throughout the pandemic, and now all people’s throwing round this phrase hybrid, however everybody has a unique definition of what it means. What’s Field’s definition of what hybrid means?

Levie: Nicely, I believe I imply, by definition the phrase hybrid drive will get you into territory the place anyone can outline it nonetheless they need. However for us, I imply, we see there’s most likely, you already know, no two corporations which are going to be precisely the identical, you already know, vis-à-vis, you already know, what number of days within the workplace do you need to be? What number of days are you able to be distant? The place are you going to be hiring from? However what we all know, for a truth, is that every little thing goes to should be in the end mediated by digital platforms. Whether or not you’re working within the workplace or distant, the entire work that you simply’re doing ultimately goes to be digitized. And in some instances, going to start out digital from the primary second that the work is occurring. And that is really the one manner that groups are going to have the ability to work on this distributed style.

And so we actually have to consider how does our work get digitized? And that’s going to supply simply basically new methods of working, new methods of collaborating, the way in which that groups get aligned and keep aligned goes to be basically totally different, the way in which that you simply ideat, the way in which that you simply design new initiatives, the thought of hopping onto a whiteboard and drawing out that complete technique—these days are largely over since you’re going to be doing that work within a digital interface on the very begin of that course of. And increasingly more of that work goes to in the end be digitized from the very first [inaudible].

Murray: Yeah, however I’m curious I imply, so that you’re going to allow individuals to do that, do no matter mixture of in-office out-of-office they wish to do. However I’m curious the way you and the way Field is coping with this. I get a way taking a look at your background there that you simply’re not at residence proper now. That’s a really workplace trying chair and sort of an workplace trying portray behind you.

Levie: I’ve tried to set my private workplace as a lot up like a daily workplace. So yeah, so I’m at residence in the meanwhile, however…

Murray: Oh, that’s superior. Okay, I known as it flawed.

Levie: It’s nearly indistinguishable within the setting that I’m working from.

Murray: So what’s your coverage for Field staff?

Levie: So there’s no coverage. We’ve, I don’t even know the quantity, perhaps a dozen places of work globally. If you happen to reside close to an workplace, you already know, typically we see you a pair or a couple of days per week however in the end you already know, we’ve a sort of versatile, digital-first oriented manner of working. And once more, it’s it’s kind of the right definition of hybrid. We haven’t compelled anyone to return in at a selected charge. However we additionally haven’t executed away with the thought of places of work. I believe that folks getting collectively in particular person continues to be an essential a part of a tradition for quite a lot of causes of simply sustaining relationships, the social dynamic of a corporation, however we predict you could be simply as productive on, you already know, successfully any system in any location. And so we’re not doing it for productiveness causes. We’re doing it as a result of to hopefully scale a worldwide tradition, individuals getting collectively as a human factor is actually essential.

McGirt: So this has been a tricky time for command and management sort of leaders who really need to have the ability to stroll right into a room and see a bunch of individuals sweating it out in cubicles in entrance of them. What are the traits of leaders who’re going to achieve success, constructing the sort of tradition that may thrive on this, this radically modified new world?

Levie: It’s, it’s a really, very totally different world, from a management standpoint, and even for those who weren’t a sort of quote unquote, command and management in the way in which that you simply simply described it, there was a whole lot of successfully sort of qualitative anecdotal data you may get simply by strolling across the workplace and what are individuals engaged on? And what are individuals blocked by? That goes away that kind of informal, kind of sidebar dialog simply doesn’t actually do as effectively within the digital area. You need to be way more intentional round the way you’re speaking, the way you’re aligning, the way you’re organizing. However it could include vital benefits once you really do exploit the ability of digital. So what we’ve seen is you’ve come down a bit bit on the axis of the in-person administration methods that Andy Grove wrote about and got here up with 30 or 40 years in the past, and what you do is for those who actually can exploit and design your group to get the advantages of digital, swiftly you will have some superpowers. So one nice instance is the flexibility to convene cross-functional individuals throughout a corporation that might have simply been impractical or not possible earlier than. So immediately, we are able to really compress the time that it takes to ship and disseminate data or get individuals aligned. One other superpower is that you simply get to contain those who beforehand perhaps wouldn’t have been capable of take part in a dialog as a result of once more, both actually was simply impractical, like they weren’t within the constructing the place the dialogue was taking place, or, you already know, if in case you have a ten particular person room, and you’ve got a extremely severe subject then you definately’re most likely going to prioritize the extra senior individuals on that specific subject, and there’s not gonna be a whole lot of room for different concepts or people to take part. Nicely, now once more, you can have a really severe subject and you can have 5 occasions the quantity of those who wouldn’t usually slot in a room. And also you may need someone who’s quote, unquote, extra up and coming or junior, that has been contributing, both presenting or developing with concepts that wouldn’t have been potential earlier than. So the publicity expands massively, and the potential involvement of and participation throughout the group expands as effectively. In order that’s a few the superpowers that you simply get without spending a dime by going digital and having the ability to work on this digital first manner.

[Music]

Murray: I’m right here with Joe Ucuzoglu, who’s the CEO of Deloitte US and had the great sense to sponsor this podcast. Thanks for being with us. And thanks in your assist.

Joe Ucuzoglu: Thanks, Alan. Pleasure to be right here.

Murray: So Joe, this new wave of enterprise know-how, synthetic intelligence, Web of Issues, the flexibility to make intelligence out of knowledge, is creating enormous alternatives for corporations. However a whole lot of the CEOs I talked to really feel daunted by it. It’s like the place did they get the creativeness to rethink their complete company? How did they take care of that?

Ucuzoglu: The alternatives are immense, and significantly once you have a look at not simply any one among these applied sciences individually, however the convergence of all of them collectively creating the chance to actually remodel enterprise fashions. And I do know it could appear daunting, however the actuality is taking a primary step in really produces enormous profit. As a result of what we’re discovering is that lots of the cutting-edge purposes are usually not popping out of the company headquarters. They’re popping out of placing the know-how within the arms of our individuals on the entrance strains. They discover new and progressive makes use of. We then funnel them again up and leverage them throughout all the consumer base.

Murray: It actually will get to the significance of a tradition of innovation on the firm.

Joe Ucuzoglu: It’s important that our individuals really feel empowered to take the most recent and best and outline new and progressive methods to make use of it for productive functions.

Murray: Thanks, Joe.

Ucuzoglu: Alan, it’s an actual pleasure.

[End music]

Murray: Aaron, my sense is you’re sort of a go-against-the-grain man.

Levie: Relies on the grain, frankly.

Murray: Nicely, I say that since you created this enterprise firm at a time when all of the cool youngsters in Silicon Valley enterprise was not cool but. I believe Steve Jobs most famously mentioned I don’t give an F dot dot dot about enterprise and you already know, every little thing was centered on shopper after which enterprise did change into cool. So that you have been you have been forward of it. Nowadays, the cool youngsters are speaking about Web3, and also you’ve been pouring some chilly water on that. Are you able to inform us why?

Levie: Nicely, it’s simply nice timing for, Alan, the journal cowl that you’ve within the background…

Murray: Sure, Sam Bankman-Fried, for these of you who can’t see it’s the cowl of Fortune journal.

Levie: …screens now so so with that with actually all respect to SPF, I’ve a barely totally different view of of Web3 that perhaps is is shared by a number of the extra crypto bulls. I, initially, I’m I’m insanely enthusiastic about nearly all innovation taking place on the Web at the moment. , when you consider AI or cloud computing or you already know the place semiconductors and chips are going. There’s a lot innovation that’s taking place proper now. So enormous optimist on the way forward for know-how.

And Web3 particularly, my problem has been extra that I haven’t been capable of sq. the kind of idealism of Web3, and perhaps the philosophy of Web3 with the precise technical and financial implementation of methods to get there. And there’s a whole lot of esoteric the reason why I really feel that manner and so glad to spend as a lot or as little time on it. However I believe the idealism of, you already know, having the ability to personal digital belongings is tremendous compelling and fascinating. The idealism of, of, you already know, extra open methods is could be very fascinating. However then to me that usually runs within the face of, of, you already know, sort of the core financial basis of Web3 of being a tokenized web, to me doesn’t really align with a lot of that imaginative and prescient the place you’d have to really you already know, pay to do extra transactions. You might have very, you already know, dynamic pricing schemes primarily based on individuals shopping for and promoting the the underlying token or forex and so you already know, inflicting a whole lot of variability in these networks that to me, I don’t, I don’t see as helpful to shoppers. And even simply the underlying kind of database itself as a blockchain is just not at all times effectively suited to the sort of concepts of the kinds of appslications [inaudible]…

Murray: So all hype? Half hype? On a scale of 1 to 10…

McGirt: Hybrid hype.

Levie: I’m going to be very boring as a result of I’ve to be tremendous nuanced. However I’d say that the way in which that Web3 is described as being potential to me doesn’t align with the know-how and financial underpinnings that I’ve seen. And so so in that case, I’d say zero by way of chance. If it modifications or if it evolves, then then perhaps it’s potential however I’ve not seen how Web3 will get created with the know-how at the moment that we’re taking a look at and speaking about or the underlying enterprise fashions and worth propositions. And I believe for those who simply requested most shoppers, most simply common those who don’t take note of any of these items that we talked about, and also you simply say, hey, if any given day would you wish to pay 30 cents or $10 or $100 to take part in some community primarily based on the shopping for and promoting and market dynamics of what they have been doing, most individuals don’t wish to do this. They don’t wish to financialize all their life. , after they go to a live performance, they wish to spend 20 bucks for the ticket and so they don’t wish to have to fret about market dynamics for simply every little thing that’s taking place. Once they be a part of an online social community, they don’t wish to should pay each time they submit a message. And so many of the issues that Web3 is kind of, you already know, theoretically attacking are literally issues that the majority shoppers most likely don’t have issues with. , all of the free providers we get on-line which are advert supported. These are most likely not issues that customers wish to have go away. And so I simply haven’t actually seen a whole lot of the core worth proposition is sensible from a shopper standpoint.

Murray: Again to the industrialist’s dilemma. Ellen and I are in a enterprise that bought actually pummeled by the transfer to digital as a result of there was no technique to extract, no straightforward technique to extract worth for digital content material. I imply, the notion of getting higher methods to extract worth from digital content material is a compelling concept to these of us who’ve lived via the final 20 years of media.

Levie: Yeah, completely. After which I do know it appears like notions don’t actually get you very far. So in the end, what will get you far is is precise shopper use instances the place individuals wish to take part  in a sustainable manner. And so I believe, perhaps the phrase the operative phrase to me is sustainable. A number of occasions when you will have dynamics the place a value of an asset can shoot up for no significantly apparent cause, then sadly, that’s normally unsustainable. And so the asset ultimately has to return again down as a result of as a result of there received’t be a future believer of that asset as soon as you already know, that hype reduces. So the problem even with issues like NFTs is is that there’s there’s not an apparent kind of underlying worth for any given NFT apart from our personal perception that sooner or later someone can pay extra for it. And so if if that begins to evaporate, then in a short time, you will have a corresponding kind of discount in worth. And so these are basically unsustainable  worth propositions are unsustainable enterprise fashions. And in order that’s why I believe it’s very laborious to construct a sustainable platform with lots of the financial underpinnings that at present Web3 is kind of, you already know, creating.

McGirt: There’s a better idiot idea joke in right here someplace I’m not going to have the ability to give you it in time although.

Levie: Yeah, I imply, it’s, it’s like sounds very boring to speak about however sadly, like at an financial precept degree, that’s what it’s. It’s someone shopping for an asset or solely perception that they will promote it to someone else sooner or later. And that’s that’s simply not a really sustainable ongoing long-term enterprise mannequin for any asset to have. Finally, you both are paying for a service or are getting cashflow. And so these are issues that should be on the root of any, any technical, you already know, new platform.

McGirt: I wish to speak about regulation to you since you you took a public stance criticizing the FTC for suing Meta. You went on Twitter and also you mentioned if the federal government blocks large tech corporations from shopping for small startups in nascent markets, all that may occur is that there shall be fewer startups over time as a result of traders can’t underwrite the danger. It’s dangerous for innovation and mockingly, good for the massive tech corporations. Inform us about why you assume that but additionally, why was it essential so that you can be public about that?

Levie: I personally don’t assume it was essential for me to be public. My Twitter, I simply see as you already know, I typically I simply have to get some ideas out onto the web. So I don’t assume it was significantly strategic or whatnot. However what I’d say is that, you already know, I’ve checked out all of the a minimum of public commentary from the FTC to Meta forwards and backwards and the FTC’s argument was, you already know, Meta ought to go and create these video games themselves, and so they shouldn’t purchase corporations to try this. And to me, you already know, you’re what you’re doing is, as FTC is now considerably taking part in god out there, the place you already know, let’s say this startup I don’t understand it very effectively, however however let’s say this startup is struggling or or perhaps not, you already know, capable of be a viable impartial firm, for no matter cause, as a result of VR is a really nascent market. There’s not a whole lot of large corporations which are paying for VR merchandise proper now. Meta most likely the first one who’s prepared to shell out giant quantities of cash for these corporations. And so FTC is principally saying, effectively, we’re sorry, startup, you’re not going be capable to get acquired and they also’re actually placing their hand on the dimensions of the market, the place they’re, they’re fully altering the market dynamics. And I believe, you already know, there’s a time and a spot for that the place you’ve bought, you already know, really monopolistic conduct that’s extraordinarily dangerous for shoppers. However in an area like VR the place perhaps there’s tens of tens of millions of customers of VR globally and we don’t even actually know the use instances but and Meta is attempting their greatest to attempt to determine methods to make one thing out of this, it simply it feels prefer it was extra of a political transfer, versus one that basically has something about shopper safety. And the issue is from the cycle of innovation, is what you need are plenty of startups that get backed by, you already know, in lots of instances, enterprise capital, and for these enterprise capitalists to in the end wish to put money into startups they should know that there’s a number of paths to getting return. So if in case you have the FTC or the federal government blocking fairly de minimis by way of affect acquisitions, it actually reshapes the panorama, as a result of why would you then put money into a VR startup when Facebook is or Meta as the one possible acquirer proper now, and so they can’t even purchase you? That simply places you in a extremely dangerous place from an innovation standpoint?

Murray: Yeah, completely. Proper. I’m not a giant fan of Meta, however I believe this can be a little bit loopy. And assuming that, that Meta fights it I can’t consider that the FTC place would maintain up in courtroom, significantly given the pretty conservative make-up of our courtroom system lately. However we’ll discover that out years and years from now. I suppose the query is whether or not they cave to the regulator upfront. Hey, Aaron, you’ve confirmed me proper. You’re a management nerd, and the right visitor for Management Subsequent. Thanks a lot for spending time with us.

Management Subsequent is edited by Nicole Vergalla, written by me, Alan Murray, together with my wonderful colleagues, Ellen McGirt and Megan Arnold. Our theme is by Jason Snell. Govt producers are Mason Cohn and Megan Arnold. Management Subsequent is a manufacturing of Fortune Media. Management Subsequent episodes are produced by Fortune‘s editorial workforce.

The views and opinions expressed by podcast audio system and company are solely their very own and don’t replicate the opinions of Deloitte or its personnel. Nor does Deloitte advocate or endorse any people or entities featured on the episodes.