[ad_1]
It ought to hardly come as a shock that the newest Porsche 911 Turbo S is a really quick automobile, however just some years after the Porsche 918 Spyder was launched, it has already come shut sufficient in efficiency to the hypercar to be a practical competitor towards it.
CarWow has lined the 2 vehicles up facet by facet to seek out out which is the best-performing in a sequence of races to see if the fashionable sports activities automobile can take on a hypercar that was thought-about cutting-edge in 2015.
Powered by a 4.6-liter, naturally-aspirated V8 based mostly on a prototype racecar’s engine, the 918 Spyder‘s driveline was then improved by a pair of electrical motors. Positioned on every axle, the motors helped system output rise to 875 hp (652 kW/887 PS).
Learn Additionally: This Yellow Porsche 918 Spyder Has A $1.2 Million Asking Price
That’s a good quantity extra than the 911 Turbo S, which places out 641 hp (478 kW/650 PS) from its 3.8-liter flat-six. These motors, and the batteries that energy them, add fairly a little bit of weight to the 918 Spyder, although.
Weighing in at 3,616 lbs (1,640 kg), the 911 Turbo S isn’t precisely the lightest automobile in the marketplace, however it weights 77 lbs (35 kg) lower than the hybrid hypercar. Because it seems, although, all of that stuff that Porsche followers say a few rear-engine structure being good for acceleration is, truly, true. Within the standing quarter-mile, the extra trendy automobile acquits itself remarkably nicely, and even wins the primary race, although that’s right down to its driver’s higher begin.
In the end, the 918 Spyder‘s superior energy ranking helps it win two of the three quarter-mile drag races, however solely simply. Within the rolling races, in the meantime, its large energy benefit helps it beat out the 911 Turbo S simply.
Regardless of that, the extra trendy automobile performs remarkably nicely, and that implies that Porsche clients at this time are shopping for monumental ranges of efficiency at a massively discounted worth.
Source link
