That is an audio model of the Wikipedia Article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_and_evil
00:01:13 1 Historical past and etymology
00:01:39 1.1 Historic world
00:02:55 1.2 Classical world
00:03:50 1.Three Medieval interval
00:04:48 1.Four Trendy concepts
00:06:35 2 Theories of ethical goodness
00:06:44 2.1 Chinese language ethical philosophy
00:07:25 2.2 Western philosophy
00:07:34 2.2.1 Pyrrhonism
00:07:53 2.2.2 Spinoza
00:09:17 2.2.Three Nietzsche
00:09:53 2.Three Psychology
00:10:02 2.3.1 Carl Jung
00:10:27 2.3.2 Philip Zimbardo
00:10:52 2.Four Faith
00:11:00 2.4.1 Abrahamic religions
00:11:08 2.4.1.1 Bahá’í Religion
00:12:16 2.4.1.2 Christianity
00:14:37 2.4.1.Three Islam
00:15:20 2.4.1.Four Judaism
00:16:11 2.4.2 Indian religions
00:16:19 2.4.2.1 Buddhism
00:17:28 2.4.2.2 Hinduism
00:18:09 2.4.2.Three Sikhism
00:19:41 2.4.Three Zoroastrianism
00:20:18 Three Descriptive, meta-ethical, and normative fields
00:21:56 Four Theories of the intrinsically good
00:22:32 4.1 Platonic idealism
00:24:24 4.2 Perfectionism
00:25:20 4.Three Welfarist theories
00:25:37 4.3.1 Subjective theories of well-being
00:29:45 4.3.2 Goal theories of well-being
00:31:52 4.3.Three Mid-range theories
00:32:26 5 Philosophical questions
00:32:36 5.1 Universality
00:35:31 5.2 Usefulness as a time period
00:39:02 5.Three Needed evil
00:40:56 6 Goodness and company
00:41:05 6.1 Goodwill
00:43:20 6.2 Society, life and ecology
00:49:23 6.Three Historical past and novelty
00:50:39 7 Goodness and morality in biology
00:51:05 eight See additionally
Listening is a extra pure method of studying, when in comparison with studying. Written language solely started at round 3200 BC, however spoken language has existed way back.
Studying by listening is a good way to:
– will increase creativeness and understanding
– improves your listening expertise
– improves your personal spoken accent
– study whereas on the transfer
– scale back eye pressure
Now study the huge quantity of common information out there on Wikipedia via audio (audio article). You would even study subconsciously by taking part in the audio while you’re sleeping! In case you are planning to pay attention quite a bit, you possibly can attempt utilizing a bone conduction headphone, or a typical speaker as a substitute of an earphone.
Pay attention on Google Assistant via Further Audio:
https://assistant.google.com/providers/invoke/uid/0000001a130b3f91
Different Wikipedia audio articles at:
https://www.youtube.com/outcomes?search_query=wikipedia+tts
Add your personal Wikipedia articles via:
https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts
Talking Charge: 0.9344185458458183
Voice identify: en-AU-Wavenet-B
“I can not educate anyone something, I can solely make them assume.”
– Socrates
SUMMARY
=======
In faith, ethics, philosophy, and psychology “good and evil” is a quite common dichotomy. In cultures with Manichaean and Abrahamic non secular affect, evil is normally perceived because the dualistic antagonistic reverse of excellent, by which good ought to prevail and evil ought to be defeated. In cultures with Buddhist non secular affect, each good and evil are perceived as a part of an antagonistic duality that itself have to be overcome via reaching Śūnyatā which means vacancy within the sense of recognition of excellent and evil being two opposing ideas however not a actuality, emptying the duality of them, and reaching a oneness.Evil, in a common context, is the absence or reverse of that which is described as being good. Typically, evil is used to indicate profound immorality. In sure non secular contexts, evil has been described as a supernatural power. Definitions of evil fluctuate, as does the evaluation of its motives. Nonetheless, components which can be generally related to evil contain unbalanced habits involving expediency, selfishness, ignorance, or neglect.The trendy philosophical questions relating to good and evil are subsumed into three main areas of research: meta-ethics in regards to the nature of excellent and evil, normative ethics regarding how we should behave, and utilized ethics regarding specific ethical points.
source