“Hindu Rastra is Drawn from the Scholarship of Colonial Historians”
Romila Thapar, on the launch of the 2 web sites of the Indian Writers’ Discussion board Belief, speaks on the latest makes an attempt on the rewriting of historical past to go well with the needs of a Hindu India. The proponents of this concept declare that historical past should not solely be rewritten, however corrected – a extra harmful proposition than rewriting. She doesn’t discover the strategy – inspite of its absurdity -, the working of some fantasy, however a really systematic strategy to go well with historical past for the argument of a Hindu state. Most of those claims are primarily based on the work of colonial scholarship such because the historians James Mill, Max Mueller, and Colonel Olcott. The irony of the actual fact stays that those that oppose the secular historical past as Western should fall again on colonial scholarship of Indian historical past carried out by – to borrow the vocabulary of the Hindu Proper – Westerners. “It’s colonial scholarship which is on the basis of this new so-called indigenous historical past”, says Thapar. She concludes by say that there could also be numerous variations of historical past, however pleads for an area the place these variations will be debated and mentioned in public or in establishments. What have to be opposed is the discount of all data to a single narrative and the grounding of that data on a single ideology.
source
