Whenever someone is injured, they are usually entitled to recover damages for their injuries. This can happen in a variety of situations, including intentional torts, negligent conduct, and punitive damages.
Table of Contents
Intentional torts
Unlike regular torts, intentional torts require a person to have intent. A tortfeasor can be held liable for damages in a civil trial, but the state must prove that the defendant committed the crime in order to win a case.
Intentional torts can include assault, battery, trespassing, false imprisonment, defamation, and conversion. All of these actions involve a willful and wrongful act. These cases can be challenging to win, but a good attorney can help. If you have suffered an intentional tort, contact an attorney as soon as possible.
Intentional torts are also different from criminal charges, as they are not generally based on reasonable doubt. The defendant can argue that they did not know that their action would cause harm, and therefore cannot be liable.
The most common types of intentional torts are trespassing, assault, battery, and false imprisonment. These acts can be perpetrated in a variety of ways, and may even occur without the defendant’s intention to harm the victim.
Negligent conduct
Unlike intentional torts, negligence claims are based on failure to act carefully. When a person acts carelessly, they are not living up to their responsibility to protect others.
Negligence claims are often filed by a plaintiff who seeks damages for injuries. Several factors can influence the amount of compensation awarded.
In general, an individual is only liable for harms that are reasonably foreseeable. If an individual is aware of the likely consequences of an action, they may be found to have acted intentionally.
In order to make a negligence claim, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed the injured party a duty of care. This duty of care is usually recognized by law.
A violation of a rule or statute establishes a breach of duty. A jury determines the appropriate damages.
In order to be successful in a negligence claim, a plaintiff must prove the following five elements. A reasonable argument is required to support the claim.
The five elements are a duty to act, breach of the duty, injury, a “factual cause,” and the damages caused by the defendant’s actions. The judge then decides the proper compensation.
Punitive damages
Generally, punitive damages are awarded when the misconduct was considered to be grossly negligent or intentionally wrongful. However, there are exceptions. In some cases, punitive damages are awarded for breach of contract.
In these instances, the award must be reasonable and based on the interests of the state in deterring the defendant from similar acts. Typically, the award is not more than four times the amount of compensatory damages. Nevertheless, the amount of the award should be viewed in light of the actual damages that the plaintiff suffered.
The amount of the punitive award should also be examined in light of the relative position of the plaintiff and the defendant. In some cases, the jury’s award of compensatory damages may be increased by the number of punitive damages awarded. The court must also consider whether the defendant’s conduct was willful.
The Supreme Court has provided guidelines for calculating punitive damages. These guidelines vary from state to state. In some states, the number of punitive damages is capped. In others, the amount of punitive damages is allowed to increase over time.
Legal interests protected by tort
Unlike criminal law, which aims to punish criminals for their wrongdoing, tort law focuses on protecting legal interests. These include rights of body, health, property, and freedom. Although there is no clear definition of what constitutes a tort, courts will weigh the various interests involved in determining whether or not a particular action is a tort.
The main remedy available to plaintiffs under tort law is compensation in damages. However, many legislatures in common law jurisdictions have imposed caps on non-economic damages and restricted judges’ ability to award punitive damages. This is intended to discourage lawsuits and create proper incentives for litigants.
Another type of tort is the outrage tort, which is often referred to as the emotional distress tort. A victim can qualify for this type of tort by proving that the defendant’s conduct was reckless or outrageous. These actions are usually based on the claimant’s mental distress, which is a serious enough issue to justify the award of monetary damages.
